> So the consolidation is just good for saving disk space? Yes, at least that's the only reason I know.
> Am I right, that I would just have to keep 1-year 5-minute-values and I can also get the cf MAX out of it? Almost, if you want average values and max values, you need both an AVERAGE and a MAX rra in you rrd database. serge. -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Harren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:29 PM To: Serge Maandag; [email protected] Subject: Re: [rrd-users] How does rrdtool behave if I store 5-minute-values for one year? Am I right, that I would just have to keep 1-year 5-minute-values and I can also get the cf MAX out of it? Best regards, Stephan Am Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2003 13:48 schrieb Serge Maandag: > rrdtool uses the values the rrd holds. For the given time frame you want > to graph, it will try to take the highest resolution data. > > If you just store 5 minute samples, it will never even think of using a > 2 hours average. > 2 hours average samples can only be displayed if your rrd database has > an RRA that averages over 2 hours. > -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
