rrd wrote: > there were a couple of mail suggesting to avoid > NFS for rrd files. > > The question is, how bad is to use nfs only for graphing > or fetching data.
Locking occurs, also for reading the RRD. AFAIK the problem is that nfs and locking don't go together. > All updates are done locally, what we want to do is split > back-end (collectors) from front-end (web-server). Perhaps you could generate the .png files locally and serve those over nfs? That, or you'd have to use a daemon on the local side that can deliver data to the other side. Search the archives of this group, the subject has come up before. cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-users WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
