On 2013-01-02 15:25, Johan Johansson wrote:
> Success:
>
> @@ -188,6 +188,8 @@
> r_exec = os.path.join(r_home, 'bin', 'R')
> # Twist if Win32
> if sys.platform == "win32":
> + if sys.version.find("64 bit") > 0:
> + r_exec = os.path.join(r_home, 'bin', 'x64', 'R')
> if sys.version_info >= (3,):
> import subprocess
> p = subprocess.Popen('"'+r_exec+'" --version',
> @@ -332,14 +334,19 @@
>
>
> def get_rconfig(r_home, about, allow_empty = False):
> - r_exec = os.path.join(r_home, 'bin', 'R')
> + if sys.platform == "win32" and sys.version.find("64 bit") > 0:
> + r_exec = os.path.join(r_home, 'bin', 'x64', 'R')
> + else:
> + r_exec = os.path.join(r_home, 'bin', 'R')
> cmd = '"'+r_exec+'" CMD config '+about
> + print cmd
> rp = os.popen(cmd)
> rconfig = rp.readline()
> #Twist if 'R RHOME' spits out a warning
> if rconfig.startswith("WARNING"):
> rconfig = rp.readline()
> rconfig = rconfig.strip()
> + print rconfig
> rc = RConfig.from_string(rconfig, allow_empty = allow_empty)
> rp.close()
> return rc
> @@ -348,6 +355,7 @@
> #r_libs = [os.path.join(RHOME, 'lib'), os.path.join(RHOME, 'modules')]
> r_libs = []
> extra_link_args = []
> + extra_compile_args = []
>
> #FIXME: crude way (will break in many cases)
> #check how to get how to have a configure step
> @@ -355,6 +363,12 @@
>
> if sys.platform == 'win32':
> define_macros.append(('Win32', 1))
> + if sys.version.find('64 bit') > 0:
> + define_macros.append(('Win64', 1))
> + extra_link_args.append('-m64')
> + extra_compile_args.append('-m64')
> + # See http://bugs.python.org/issue4709
> + define_macros.append(('MS_WIN64', 1))
> else:
> define_macros.append(('R_INTERFACE_PTRS', 1))
> define_macros.append(('HAVE_POSIX_SIGJMP', 1))
> @@ -368,7 +382,6 @@
> else:
> pass
>
> -
> include_dirs = []
>
> rinterface_ext = Extension(
> @@ -403,8 +416,9 @@
> library_dirs = r_libs,
> define_macros = define_macros,
> runtime_library_dirs = r_libs,
> + extra_compile_args=extra_compile_args,
> #extra_compile_args=['-O0', '-g'],
> - #extra_link_args = extra_link_args
> + extra_link_args = extra_link_args
> )
>
> rpy_device_ext = Extension(
> @@ -419,6 +433,7 @@
> library_dirs = r_libs,
> define_macros = define_macros,
> runtime_library_dirs = r_libs,
> + extra_compile_args=extra_compile_args,
> #extra_compile_args=['-O0', '-g'],
> extra_link_args = extra_link_args
> )
>
> It turned out to be (mostly) a matter of defining the right
> preprocessor symbols. I've run through some of the examples in the
> documentation with no obvious ill effects.
Great!
`python -m rpy2.tests` will run all unittests
Win64 users will certainly be happy. Can you submit a pull request ?
(easier for me). Thanks.
L.
>
> Johan
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Johan Johansson <johan2s...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Laurent Gautier <lgaut...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2013-01-01 23:45, Johan Johansson wrote:
>>>> #if SIZEOF_SIZE_T != SIZEOF_INT
>>>> /* On a 64-bit system, rename the Py_InitModule4 so that 2.4
>>>> modules cannot get loaded into a 2.5 interpreter */
>>>> #define Py_InitModule4 Py_InitModule4_64
>>>> #endif
>>> The comment suggests that this concerns pre-Python2.4 vs post-Python2.5
>>> compiled module.
>>> May be not a big issue for now.
>> What worries me is that SIZEOF_SIZE_T shouldn't equal SIZEOF_INT on a
>> 64-bit system but apparently does. This makes me suspect I'm missing
>> compiler flags/defines somewhere.
>>
>> Johan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery
and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts.
SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________
rpy-list mailing list
rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
