Hi Bo, As soon as I confirm that all the tests run properly, I'll post the source package for 1.0.1. I'll be glad to let you build and upload the windows binary version...
-G On Nov 29, 2007, at 11:48AM , Bo Peng wrote: >> Somehow I missed the removal of the 'xstr(...)' when I generated >> the source >> for 1.0.0. I've committed the appropriate change to svn, and >> have built a >> Windows binary installer for rpy, which I will post once I've run >> through >> the tests to ensure that everything else is happy... > > I am about to generate and upload > rpy-1.0.0.win32-R2.0.0-R-2.6.1-py2.4/5.exe until I see this post. Will > you relase 1.0.1 or will you simply upload windows binaries with this > patch? > > I would suggest that you release 1.0.1. Having the binary built from a > patched release is confusing. > > Cheers, > Bo > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper > from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going > mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. > http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 > _______________________________________________ > rpy-list mailing list > rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ rpy-list mailing list rpy-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rpy-list
