pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3726)

Oh, I totally forgot having said that about the header digest. Fair enough 
:smile: 
rpm-sequoia <= 1.8.0 doesn't (fully) support SHA3, at least for 
rpmDigestLength() it doesn't. Haven't tested otherwise, but it's an okay point 
to actually test it now...

I merged the build process commit manually, thanks for that. I might be able to 
use the header SHA3 thing too, so I'll leave this open for a bit more.

As for the payload digest, I commented in the ticket itself: 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3642#issuecomment-2900139799
 It's a fine example of what a minefield rpm is, and hopefully you can see why 
it took me a long time to respond.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3726#issuecomment-2900175256
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3726/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to