pmatilai created an issue (rpm-software-management/rpm#3676)
Inspired by the (re-)realizations in #3652:
> There's a flaw in this split however: rpmkeys requires write access to the
> keyring, and that's something you wouldn't want when verifying the
> signatures. The clue to the right split is right there in the previous
> sentence: verification. Verify, and query, don't need write permissions
> anywhere on the system. So that's where the "fault line" and split executable
> should be. Once upon a time there even was such a split but it was so
> cumbersomely implemented by ifdef'ing throughout the main rpm.c code that we
> merged that part back in.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3676
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
