dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3591)
> FWIW, the `_` vs `*` stuff in your fixup - I initially wanted to change all
> our man-pages to use underlines where appropriate instead of bold everywhere,
> but after realizing what a mutha of a job this is, decided to leave that job
> till later time. And apparently forgot to revert some of the early
> conversion. So good spotting.
Oh yup, I agree with that, and thought the same :smile: The fixup indeed just
fixes the forgotten usages to make things consistent for now.
FTR, one more notable thing I also did in the fixup is adding line breaks
(`++`) to the attribute markers (e.g. `%artifact`) in the rpm(8) man page since
they were otherwise rendered as a continuous paragraph. As part of that, I also
needed to un-indent the whole list since scdoc would otherwise indent all but
the first line by one more level (for some reason, perhaps something fixable
but I didn't dig too deep into that).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3591#issuecomment-2681226006
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3591/c2681226...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
