pmatilai left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#3578)
> Will this include some tooling to also solve the "requires" side? To help
> with cases such as
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-ruby-vips/blob/137e3adee00c987c5c0b9f2d746ffb8b415f930b/f/rubygem-ruby-vips.spec#_24-25
noarch -> arch dependencies are technically a different problem than this is
trying to solve, for which we simply don't have any good solutions atm.
Thanks for the reminder though - as is, this would actually the manual soname
dependency in the example N times worse because then have to list all the
variants. IMO the least worst solution is to drop the BuildArch: noarch in
these cases.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3578#issuecomment-2667734218
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3578/c2667734...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
