> If you are interested, here is my first draft implementation of this:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros/pull-request/455
This is of course several months late, missed originally due to vacation, but
most certainly have been looking forward to real-world uses, lab testing only
gets you so far.
>From a quick look, my takeaways are:
- Spec backwards compatibility is a bit of a pain point, there might be some
value in teaching rpm 4.19 to parse (but not build) specs utilitizing
buildsystem constructs, considering 4.19 will live for a long long time in RHEL
10
- having a generic way to declare mandatory options could be handy
Anything else that's not so immediately obvious?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2997#discussioncomment-11301812
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2997/comments/11301...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
