Note, there is a pattern here that seems valid to me, which triggers this
warning. See [Fedora's evolution-data-server
package](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/evolution-data-server/blob/rawhide/f/evolution-data-server.spec).
An edited extract:
```
# 0-99: General patches
# 100-199: Flatpak-specific patches
# https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution-data-server/-/merge_requests/144
Patch100: Make-DBUS_SERVICES_PREFIX-runtime-configurable.patch
...
%prep
%autosetup -p1 -S gendiff -N
# General patches
%autopatch -p1 -m 0 -M 99
# Flatpak-specific patches
%if 0%{?flatpak}
%autopatch -p1 -m 100 -M 199
%endif
```
that is, it wants to carry "general" patches **IF ANY** in the range 0-99, and
"flatpak-specific" patches **IF ANY** in the range 100-199. The problem comes
if we don't have at least one general patch and one flatpak-specific patch,
because now that triggers this warning. But you can see the logic of what the
package wants to do, and it makes sense, and I don't see how it could avoid
this warning...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3093#issuecomment-2483643008
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3093/2483643...@github.com>_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
