@pmatilai commented on this pull request.


> @@ -82,8 +84,13 @@ static rpmRC audit_tsm_post(rpmPlugin plugin, rpmts ts, 
> int res)
            rasprintf(&eventTxt,
                    "op=%s %s sw_type=rpm key_enforce=%u gpg_res=%u %s",
                    op, nevra, enforce, verified, dir);
-           audit_log_user_comm_message(auditFd, AUDIT_SOFTWARE_UPDATE,
-                                   eventTxt, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, result);
+           if (audit_log_user_comm_message(auditFd, AUDIT_SOFTWARE_UPDATE,

Yup. This is the kind of stuff that happens when you just want something 
quickly out of the way and instead of stopping to think for a second (because 
this is not the thing you're interested just now) you think to work around it 
somehow. And then later realize doing the right thing would've been at least as 
simple :facepalm: :smile: 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3445#discussion_r1842163108
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3445/review/2435989...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to