> Why are the following two test cases expected to fail?
Because of: 066c00c908cb2616bae63a2bbc0f6078a694e808
> The test case is expected to fail because the #1800 problem has not been
> resolved.
Yes, that's very much the case, #1800 is not yet fixed. Once it is fixed, these
tests will be "enabled" (i.e. the `AT_XFLAIL_IF`s will be removed).
> I think the test cases is unreasonable, and they simply give the expected
> results on the basis of errors. In other words, if the #1800 problem is fixed
> later, these two test cases may fail, but in fact, this is the expected
> normal result, and the test cases should be modified. In this case, the
> existence of the test cases is meaningless.
I don't follow. How are the test cases "unreasonable"?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3295#issuecomment-2357736037
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3295/2357736...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
