Ok, now the error reporting is better. It probably still should use the most
secure hash / signature that is broken but at least it will no longer report
"no signature"
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3194#issuecomment-2239980038
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/3194/c2239980...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
