Coming back to this: to avoid gratuitious compatibility breakage, we can't put
either 0 or 6 in there.
The best we can do is put 4 in there because all of rpm 4.x used 3 as the major
version for alleged LSB compatibility, so it at least differentiates it a bit.
It's not such a terrible lie even because the fundamental header structure of
v6 is basically v4...
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2374#discussioncomment-8528530
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
<rpm-software-management/rpm/repo-discussions/2374/comments/8528...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
