Which is what I said in the first comment:
> Docs of course entirely missing as well, this is just an early rough-cut for
> feedback.
Using plain macros instead of writing them into files and then parsing is
required to handle %prep which is special and using a simple macro just doesn't
work, and also to supposedly allow full spec syntax with %if's and the like to
be used in the autobuild macros. That doesn't work if we just drop in some
macros at the end of the parse, which is the simplest possible approach of
course.
At this point I'm more interested in the mechanism and what might be missing.
Such as the excellent point about BuildRequires from @voxik (in the ticket).
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2620#issuecomment-1691564769
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2620/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
