> > I can think of one real-world case this would have broke: the SDL ->
> > sdl12-compat transition
>
> Would that have required Fedora to do more than either [bump the so
> version](https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdl12-compat/commit/883b629995e998e04b2ccd80a2c3ada46b0ce093)
> or, worst case, manually add a Provides: line to the spec file?
The version scheme was changed to match SDL 1.2 later to deal with weaknesses
in the Debian's packaging system. It was originally not that way.
Bumping the soversion would have been a big deal, since it's an ABI break. I'm
not really sure this is a good idea.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372#issuecomment-1409055972
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2372/c1409055...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
