> The test is much too strict. Using the Sequoia backend, this fails as follows:
>
> ```
> $ ./rpmkeys --import ./tests/testing/data/keys/type-confusion.asc
> warning: Certificate 4344591E1964C5FC:
> Policy rejects subkey 185E6146F00650F8: No binding signature at time
> 2022-11-09T15:08:19Z
> ```
Sorry about that. Without the fix the internal backend segfaults IIRC.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2272#issuecomment-1309446364
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2272/1309446...@github.com>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
