SUSE Linux distributions follow this guideline for categorizing packages with 
the Group tag: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_group_guidelines

Mageia follows this policy: https://wiki.mageia.org/en/RPM_groups_policy

OpenMandriva follows a similar policy to Mageia.

ALT Linux, PLD Linux, PCLinuxOS, and several other distributions also use the 
Group tag in this manner.

The key reason why Red Hat/Fedora never bothered to extend the groups is 
because we've never had a tool in Fedora (prior to dnfdragora) that was capable 
of organizing packages by the Group tag that was using the default package 
manager.

With apt-rpm, of course, there was Synaptic, which did organize it that way. 
And smart's GUI did too. But none of the GUI interfaces for YUM ever did, so 
there was not as much reason to extend the classifications for packages to 
actually support the wider array of packages.

However, DNF does today through 
[dnfdragora](https://github.com/manatools/dnfdragora) on every distribution 
except Fedora, where it is built with `-DENABLE_COMPS=1` (which incidentally 
makes it much slower to map all the packages to groups due to the M:N 
relationship and the fact it's a subset mapping that has to be built up as the 
app starts). 

In SUSE distributions, both Zypper and YaST2 are capable of sorting through 
packages by the Group tag. In Mageia and OpenMandriva, RPMDrake (the legacy 
package manager) and dnfdragora (the new one) both sort by the Group tag. While 
DNF does not yet present the Group information at the CLI (it's something I am 
going to do at some point), urpmi (the legacy package manager) does.

I don't know where the decision to not sort packages came from, but that's 
pretty much the difference between Fedora and every other distribution.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/534#issuecomment-416206921
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint

Reply via email to