Hmmm, I use only the notation editor. My understanding of notation is that a 
whole note is a whole measure. So if I have a note to be held longer than a 
measure (say 3), I put a whole note in each measure and tie them together. Not 
make a dotted whole note to get a note that runs longer than a measure.

Just my free contribution.

David W. Jones
[email protected]
authenticity, honesty, community
http://dancingtreefrog.comOn Apr 7, 2016 02:37, Lorenzo Sutton 
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi! 
>
> On 07/04/2016 00:27, Silas Mortimer wrote: 
>
> [...] 
>
> > One example is at one point I wanted to make a chord ring out 
> > longer than I'd originally put it and had already added notes after 
> > it. I searched for what I should do there, and from what I gather, I 
> > could only do that in the matrix editor. Is that the case? Anyway, I 
> > did it there, and the notation not only looks bad, it no longer makes 
> > sense. I think there might be a whole note listed in one bar (again, 
> > it's in 2/4), and there's something that should be tied, plays like 
> > it's tied, but it's not shown that way. 
>
> I think that's expected and software can't really help you there. 
>
> I guess this is the basic concept and conundrum of sequencer which (like 
> rosegarden) also support notation: if the notation is 'perfect' from a 
> visual/typesetting point of view it will sound mechanical from a 
> performance point of view. The matrix editor (aka Piano Roll in some 
> software) enables you to tweak notes so that e.g. they result more 
> realistic but that will inevitably screw notation. 
>
> Really, it's a conundrum in music itself. No one performs exactly what 
> is written on a score (some contemporary music can be an exception), so 
> imagine writing down on a score *exactly* what a performer is playing... 
>
> Rosegarden actually does have some 'intelligence' when it comes to 
> interpreting notation (e.g. dynamics), but it cannot 'imagine' what you 
> would like especially in terms of note onsets and lengths. 
>
> My recommendation would be to: 
> a.) use notation for: 
> 1. Inputting notes when you are familiar or more comfortable with 
> traditional notation. 
> 2. Want to concentrate on the notation aspects of your piece, e.g. 
> because you want to eventually publish it. 
>
> b.) Use the matrix editor when: 
> 1. You want to concentrate on how your piece actually sounds. 
> 2. You become familiar enough with the matrix paradigm to be able to 
> input notes directly there. 
> 3. Adjust at the fine level not onsets, durations, velocities etc. 
>
> To conclude, take into account that some sequencers simply do not 
> provide notation, so think of Rosegarden as a sequencer with a (very 
> advanced compared to many sequencers) support for notation  ;) 
>
> Hope this helps. 
> Lorenzo. 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Rosegarden-user mailing list 
> [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-user mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user

Reply via email to