On 01/21/2016 09:33 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > I ran Cakewalk for DOS on a 386, but we're talking about a midi only > application. Are you talking about cakewalk with audio, VST (or > whatever) synth plugins etc.?
I think it had extremely early and rudimentary audio support, but nothing like VSTs or other plugins yet. However, I was just comparing basic MIDI to basic MIDI performance. It used to kill me that Rosegarden would barely function on a 1 GHz machine for doing straight up data pumping through a hardware MIDI interface, which is where this old comparison comes from. Even then, the comparison wasn't fair. That machine and OS wasn't doing any heavy multitasking or low latency anything. The graphics across the board, and especially in Cakewalk, were vastly less sophisticated, and on and on. -- D. Michael McIntyre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-user mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-user
