Hello Andreas,
When I met Jim Cline at the Denver Conference he spoke about a fluid to drop into a (possibly backloaded) powder sample in order to make it solid. I will not put Jim's e-mail address on the Rietveld list but am quite sure he is subscribed - Jim, could you advise?
With best regards,
Martijn
Dr. Martijn J. Fransen
Product Manager XRD
PANalytical
Lelyweg 1
7602 EA Almelo, The Netherlands
Phone ++31 546 534 345
Fax ++ 31 546 534 598
Take a look at our new website! www.panalytical.com
|
Andreas Leineweber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/09/2004 03:57 PM
|
|
Dear all,
when powder samples are measured in reflection on back-loaded samples on
a theta-2theta diffractometer, there is always the danger that upon
sample spinning the powder can fall out of its cavity. As a solution I
tried a thin mylar foil, which, however, gives nasty background. Another
procedure may be a little bit of glue (e.g. dissolved in a solvent to
dillute it).
Has somebody some practical good experiences with certain types of glues
(influence on background, how much glue, which solvent) or does somebody
know some further tricks.
Thank you for your help
Andreas
PS. I am working with the Philips/Panalytical sample preparation equipment.
--
Dr. Andreas Leineweber
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Metallforschung
Heisenbergstrasse 3
70569 Stuttgart
Germany
Telephone: +49 (0)711 689 3365
Telefax: +49 (0)711 689 3312
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mf.mpg.de/de/abteilungen/mittemeijer/english/index_english.htm
Spam detection software, running on the system "lima.ill.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details.
Content preview: This is a multipart message in MIME format. Hello Andreas, When I met Jim Cline at the Denver Conference he spoke about a fluid to drop into a (possibly backloaded) powder sample in order to make it solid. I will not put Jim's e-mail address on the Rietveld list but am quite sure he is subscribed - Jim, could you advise? [...] Content analysis details: (6.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name 0.2 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.7 HTML_20_30 BODY: Message is 20% to 30% HTML 5.1 PORN_4 URI: URL uses words/phrases which indicate porn
