Could you share URL for those outstanding failures please. B

> On 27 Mar 2018, at 16:37, Russell Brown <russell.br...@me.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Again,
> 
> More progress update. All the PRs are merged (thanks Bryan Hunt (ESL)
> and Nick/Martin (bet365)).
> 
> I’m planning on tagging Riak with riak-2.2.5RC1 this week.
> 
> We haven’t been able to run load tests. I’m not 100% sure that all
> basho’s releases had extensive load tests run, though I know that
> later releases had a perf team, and MvM always load tested leveldb.
> 
> The aim is to have those willing parties that deploy riak, and
> therefore have perf testing already set up, to test and report
> back. The NHS will run load tests and report results back. I hope that others 
> can do the same.
> To the end we’ll probably tag RC1-noperftest.
> 
> There are a few failing riak tests (was Riak ever released without a
> failing riak-test?) If you have the time/capacity to run riak-test,
> and you’re interested in helping out, get in touch and I’ll help you
> get started.
> 
> The failures, should one pique your interest:
> 
> datatypes - riak667_mixed-eleveldb
> ensemble - ensemble_basic3-eleveldb ensemble_basic4-eleveldb
> yoko - yz_crdt-eleveldb yz_solr_upgrade_downgrade-eleveldb
> 
> Let me know if you want to look into ensemble or yoko.
> 
> Still aiming to have this tagged by end-of-week.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Russell
> 
> On 2 Mar 2018, at 09:44, Russell Brown <russell.br...@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just an update on the progress of riak-2.2.5 release. I realize we said
>> "end of 2017" and then "end of Jan" and then "end of Feb" and here we
>> are, 1st March, spring is upon us, and still no 2.2.5. I thought it best
>> to at least keep you posted.
>> 
>> Why no release? Well, we're not quite finished yet. In terms of what is
>> left:
>> 
>> - a few PRs need review and merge against the upstream Basho repo (see
>> [1] if you want to help there);
>> - Opening of PRs for gsets;
>> - Docs for the changes;
>> - Release notes;
>> - Tagging;
>> - A final round of testing (and fixing?) after all is merged;
>> - Client support. This is crucial, but all the above work only has
>> client support in the Basho erlang clients. I'm hoping the community
>> that uses the Java/Python/Ruby etc clients can step up here. But we can 
>> release Riak before all client work is done.
>> 
>> The optimist in me says 2 weeks.
>> 
>> What do I mean "release"?
>> 
>> From my point of view the release is the tags. After that I'm sincerely
>> hoping ESL will continue to kindly build and host the actual artifacts.
>> 
>> What's in the release?
>> 
>> As a reminder, since it's been a while since StokeCon17, this release
>> contains:
>> 
>> - Some developer clean-up around `make test` and `riak_test` to make
>> them more reliable/trustworthy;
>> - Open source MDC Repl (thanks bet365!);
>> - A fix for a bug in riak core claim that led to unbalanced rings[2];
>> - `node_confirms` a feature like `w` or `pw` but for physical diversity in 
>> durability[3];
>> - `participate in coverage` an admin setting that takes a node out of
>> the coverage plan (for example after adding a node while transfers
>> take place);
>> - Riak repl fix, and change to unsafe default behaviour[4];
>> - Addition of a GSet to riak data types;
>> - Fix to repl stats[5].
>> 
>> Sorry if I missed anything. The release notes will have it all.
>> 
>> Work is already begun on Riak 3.0 with OTP20 support well under way.
>> Some candidates for inclusion that we're working on are a new
>> pure-Erlang backend[6], and a radical overhaul of AAE for both intra and 
>> inter-cluster anti-entropy.
>> 
>> Sorry for the delay, thanks for your patience. We’ll keep you posted.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Russell
>> 
>> Titus Systems - ti-sys.co.uk
>> 
>> [1] Coverage:
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_core/pull/917
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pull/1664
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_test/pull/1300
>> 
>> Repl:
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_repl/pull/777
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_test/pull/1301
>> 
>> Node Confirms:
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_test/pull/1299
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_test/pull/1298
>> https://github.com/basho/riak-erlang-client/pull/371
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_core/pull/915
>> https://github.com/basho/riak-erlang-http-client/pull/69
>> 
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_core/blob/develop-2.2/docs/claim-fixes.md
>> [3]
>> https://github.com/ramensen/riak_kv/blob/rs-physical-promises/docs/Node-Diversity.md
>> [4] https://github.com/basho/riak_repl/issues/774
>> https://github.com/basho/riak_repl/issues/772
>> [5] https://github.com/basho/riak_repl/pull/776
>> [6] https://github.com/martinsumner/leveled/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> riak-users mailing list
>> riak-users@lists.basho.com
>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to