Hi Daniel - This is a strange scenario. I recommend looking at all of the log files for "[error]" or other entries at about the same time as these PUTs or 404 responses.
Is there anything unusual about the key being used? -- Luke Bakken Engineer lbak...@basho.com On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:40 AM, Daniel Miller <dmil...@dimagi.com> wrote: > I have a 9-node Riak CS cluster that has been working flawlessly for about 3 > months. The cluster configuration, including backend and bucket parameters > such as N-value are using default settings. I'm using the S3 API to > communicate with the cluster. > > Within the past week I had an issue where two objects were PUT resulting in > a 200 (success) response, but all subsequent GET requests for those two keys > return status of 404 (not found). Other than the fact that they are now > missing, there was nothing out of the ordinary with these particular to > PUTs. Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems like a scenario that > should never happen. All information included here about PUTs and GETs comes > from reviewing the CS access logs. Both objects were PUT on the same node, > however GET requests returning 404 have been observed on all nodes. There is > plenty of other traffic on the cluster involving GETs and PUTs that are not > failing. I'm unsure of how to troubleshoot further to find out what may have > happened to those objects and why they are now missing. What is the best > approach to figure out why an object that was successfully PUT seems to be > missing? > > Thanks! > Daniel Miller > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
