I'd completely forgotten leveldb had that advantage. Russell is correct. Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 8, 2016, at 4:51 PM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@me.com> wrote: > > Depends on what backend you are running, no? If leveldb then this list keys > operation can be pretty cheap. > > It’s a coverage query, but if it’s leveldb at least you will seek to the > start of the bucket and iterate over only the keys in that bucket. > > Cheers > > Russell > >> On 8 Dec 2016, at 21:19, John Daily <jda...@basho.com> wrote: >> >> The size of the bucket has no real impact on the cost of a list keys >> operation because each key on the cluster must be examined to determined >> whether it resides in the relevant bucket. >> >> -John >> >>> On Dec 8, 2016, at 4:17 PM, Arun Rajagopalan <arun.v.rajagopa...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Riak Users >>> >>> I have a use case where I would really like to list all keys of a bucket >>> despite all the warnings about performance. The number of keys is >>> relatively small - in the few thousands at the very most, Usually its no >>> more than 100 >>> >>> I also have other buckets in the same cluster that have millions of keys >>> and tens of tera bytes of data >>> >>> Question: Will listing all keys on the small bucket adversely impact >>> performance of the other larger buckets? >>> >>> Thanks >>> Arun >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
