Hi Norman,

It's still the case. Riak KV was designed to be highly available, and
highly scalable key/value store with predictable low latency.  This lets
you scale to a few or as many machines as needed, while removing any single
failure points that a single-machine database or cache might impose.

We unfortunately don't have connectors for every language / platform /
framework combination, the explosive exponential swath of support would be
exhausting.  We do keep well maintained client libraries
<http://docs.basho.com/riak/kv/2.1.4/developing/client-libraries/>, and
community libraries and plugins are always growing in number. I think
Luke's suggestion would provide a good way forward, and we'd be happy to
help with any questions you have along the way.

Thanks,
Alex

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:51 PM Norman Khine <nor...@khine.net> wrote:

> hi luke, thanks for the reply, in the riak document "Riak KV is uniquely
> architected to handle user and session data..." or is this no longer the
> case?
>
>
> On 2 June 2016 at 17:40, Luke Bakken <lbak...@basho.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Norman,
> >
> > A quick search turns up this Node.js module:
> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/express-session
> >
> > There is currently not a session store for Riak
> > (https://www.npmjs.com/package/express-session#compatible-session-stores
> )
> >
> > Since memcached operates as a key/value store, forking the connector
> > for that session store as a starting point would be your best bet.
> >
> > https://github.com/balor/connect-memcached
> >
> > You would then use the Riak Node.js client to fetch and store data:
> > https://github.com/basho/riak-nodejs-client
> >
> > --
> > Luke Bakken
> > Engineer
> > lbak...@basho.com
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Norman Khine <nor...@khine.net> wrote:
> > > hello, i am trying to setup a node.js/express application to use riak
> to
> > > store the logged in users' sessions as detailed
> > > http://basho.com/use-cases/session-data/
> > >
> > > i have setup the dev cluster on my machine and everything is running
> fine.
> > >
> > > what is the correct way to set this up?
> > >
> > > any advise much appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > %>>> "".join( [ {'*':'@','^':'.'}.get(c,None) or
> chr(97+(ord(c)-83)%26) for
> > > c in ",adym,*)&uzq^zqf" ] )
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > riak-users mailing list
> > > riak-users@lists.basho.com
> > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
> > >
>
>
>
>
> --
> %>>> "".join( [ {'*':'@','^':'.'}.get(c,None) or chr(97+(ord(c)-83)%26)
> for c in ",adym,*)&uzq^zqf" ] )
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to