+1 On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Sargun Dhillon <sar...@sargun.me> wrote: > We're using riak_dt in anger in our product. We are already using it > with rebar3, and Erlang 18.3 through some super messy patches. > > I would love to see a register that takes the logical clock, and > timestamp for resolution, rather than just a straightup timestamp. My > biggest ask though is delta-CRDTs. Delta-CRDTs with a decent > anti-entropy algorithm would allow our system to scale from 1000s of > keys to 100ks of keys. > > Nonetheless, Riak_dt is an awesome library, and we're probably > planning on contributing back to it soonish, especially if any of the > other comments on this thread are things we need, and Basho doesn't. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Russell Brown <russell.br...@me.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> Riak DT[1] is in need of some love. I know that some of you on this list >> (Sargun, are you here? Heinz?) have expressed opinions on the work that >> needs doing. Here is my short list, I would love to hear opinions on >> priority, and any additions to this list: >> >> 1. merger smaller map branch >> 2. deltas >> 3. new data types (we have a range register and some and >> Multi-Value-Register to add, any more?) >> 4. Internal state as records or maps (but not these messy tuples) >> 5. update to rebar3 >> 6. update to latest erlang >> >> I’m pretty sure there is plenty more. Would greatly appreciate your feedback. >> >> Many thanks >> >> Russell >> >> [1] https://github.com/basho/riak_dt/ >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
