Hi John, I believe I saw this conversation over IRC. Sean responded saying "those measure at different layers, seems reasonable to me. I mean, your 100% is bad... but those numbers seem to make sense to me."
Did you end up finding the clarity you need here? It'd be helpful to hear the details. *Matt Brender | Developer Advocacy Lead* Basho Technologies t: @mjbrender <https://twitter.com/mjbrender> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:36 PM, John O'Brien <boar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Quick question... > > Is it safe to assume these two metrics endpoint are expected to display > the same stats. > > watch -n 1 riak-admin stat show **get_fsm_time** > > shows 0's for node_get_fsm_time_99/95 (occasionally will see stats build > up for them, but then vanish back to 0). > > The stats interface via :8098/stats seems to be more reliable, in that I > never see 0 entries.. > > This running riak 2.0.5, although I'm pretty sure I recall seeing this on > previous deployments. > > Thanks, > > John > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
