I can't recall right now, but it's safe to assume I did delete it. As for nodes, I have added one, nothing more.
Kind regards, Cezary 2015-02-19 18:01 GMT+01:00 Zeeshan Lakhani <zlakh...@basho.com>: > So, AAE is running. > > Again, did you delete the single object at some point? Trying to see if > this is related to you hitting a tombstone on queries. Also, when you added > the object, did you add it and later leave (drop) a node from your cluster? > > Thanks. > > Zeeshan Lakhani > programmer | > software engineer at @basho | > org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | > twitter => @zeeshanlakhani > > On Feb 19, 2015, at 11:53 AM, Cezary Kosko <koskoceza...@gmail.com> wrote: > > By './data/yz_anti_entropy' do you mean '/var/lib/riak/yz_anti_entropy' by > default or './data/yz_anti_entropy' inside each index's directory? If the > former - it's there, the latter - not. riak-admin search aae-status says > there's been some AAE activity in the past few hours. > > Also I called yz_entropy_mgr:init([]) inside an attached erlang shell and > curl-ed the object, it's still the same. > > Kind regards, > Cezary > > 2015-02-19 17:27 GMT+01:00 Zeeshan Lakhani <zlakh...@basho.com>: > >> Thanks Cezary. >> >> Have you deleted this object at some point in your runs? Please make sure >> AAE is running by checking search’s AAE status, `riak-admin search >> aae-status`, and that data exists in the correct directory, >> `./data/yz_anti_entropy` ( >> http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/configs/search/). You may >> just need to perform a read-repair by performing a fetch of the object >> itself first, before performing search queries again. >> >> Zeeshan Lakhani >> programmer | >> software engineer at @basho | >> org. member/founder of @papers_we_love | >> twitter => @zeeshanlakhani >> >> On Feb 19, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Cezary Kosko <koskoceza...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I have the exact same issue with regular http search queries, so I guess >> I'll just describe that part. >> >> I've got a bucket of maps-of-sets, 2 of them are entityId_set and >> timestamps_set. Its search index is called 'job' and it's only this bucket >> that's indexed. >> >> When I run >> curl >> "localhost:8098/search/query/job?wt=json&q=entityId_set:100000000000000000%20AND%20timestamps_set:%5B1419721530%20TO%201419721539%5D" >> >> (that's a query that is supposed to return exactly one result), the >> numFound field is either 0 or 1, it seems that I get both kinds of result >> in 10 consecutive requests (and the timeAllowed parameter I wrote about, it >> doesn't really help). >> >> That's the way they're handled in the schema: >> >> <field name="entityId_set" type="string" indexed="true" >> stored="false" multiValued="true" /> >> <field name="timestamps_set" type="string" indexed="true" >> stored="false" multiValued="true" /> >> >> >> Kind regards, >> Cezary >> >> 2015-02-19 16:04 GMT+01:00 Zeeshan Lakhani <zlakh...@basho.com>: >> >>> Hello Cezary, >>> >>> Firstly, are you able to retrieve your search result consistently when >>> not using doing a mapreduce job? >>> >>> To better help out, can you send a gist of the mapreduce code you’re >>> running? Thanks. >>> >>> >>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:13 PM, Cezary Kosko <koskoceza...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've got a search index, and I'd like to run mapred job against that >>> index. The thing is, for a search query that should return exactly one >>> result, I sometimes (not always, yet not rarely) get none, i.e. the mapred >>> job returns an empty list instead of, say, a list containing a single >>> object. Did this only happen some time after uploading the data and then >>> was consistently giving the right results, I wouldn't object. However, it's >>> kind of an on-and-off situation - I get proper results, but then for a >>> brief period of time I don't and so on. >>> >>> I've read on a solr doc page that specifying a timeAllowed parameter in >>> the query can give it longer to gather results and help, but that can't be >>> specified in a mapred definition, or can it? >>> >>> Is there anything else I can look for? >>> >>> The data I'm querying is of the CRDT map-of-sets type, should that be of >>> any relevance. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Cezary >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
