Hi, On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com> wrote: > Same client code writing to all 5 clusters?
Yes, it is the same code. > > How does the config of the 5th cluster differ from the first 4? > Two clusters have one more memory backend configured (they are configured with multibackend). The cluster with issues is one of these two clusters. > Quick notes: > Minimum of 5 nodes for a production deployment to ensure the default 3 > replicas are all on different physical nodes. Which is a good segue into the > fact that you shouldn't run multiple Riak nodes on the same physical > hardware. Performance aside, if you lose that physical machine you lose all > your data. Yes, these clusters (that are located in the same physical machine) are used for the developing team. Regards. > > > @siculars > http://siculars.posthaven.com > > Sent from my iRotaryPhone > >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 18:59, Claudio Cesar Sanchez Tejeda >> <demoncc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm a sysadmin and I managing 5 cluster of RIAK: >> >> - two of them are LXC containers on the same physical machine (3 nodes >> per cluster) >> - one of them are LXC containers located on different physical >> machines (6 nodes) >> - one of them are LXC containers located on different physical >> machines and XEN VMs (6 nodes) >> - and the last of them are VMware ESX VMs (3 nodes) >> >> Our application works correctly on the first four clusters, but it >> doesn't work as we expected on the last one. >> >> When we update a key and we retrieve this key in order to write it >> again, it has an old value (it doesn't have the first value that we >> wrote), for example: >> >> The key has: lalala >> We retrieve the key, and add lololo, so it should be lalala,lololo >> We retrieve the key again, and try to add lelele, so it should be now: >> lalala,lololo,lelele, but when we retrieve it again, we only have: >> lalala,lelele >> >> In the second write action, when we retrieve the key, we obtained a >> key with the old value. We set r, w, pr and rw to 3 to the REST >> requests, but it doesn't help. >> >> All the configuration files are very similiar and we don't have any >> major differences in the disk I/O and network performance of the nodes >> of the clusters. >> >> Did anyone have a similar issue? >> >> Regards. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
