On May 21, 2014 02:33:40 PM Oleksiy Krivoshey wrote: > I think I've found that rare case when I don't get deletedvlock before > 'put' in my code. > > Sorry for bothering everyone :) > > On 21 May 2014 14:15, Oleksiy Krivoshey <oleks...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think its a different issue and might be my own misunderstanding: > > > > The actual order of operations is (all same key): > > > > 1. write > > 3. read > > 4. delete > > 5. write > > 6. read - failed > > > > So it might be tombstone problem. However I always do 'get' with > > 'deletedvclock: true' before 'put' or 'delete' and provide a vclock. I've seen a similar failure case when I was playing around with Riak. I found the solution is to do a read before 5 with r=n (r=3 in the default case), and then do the write with the returned vclock, if any is returned. Try that and see if it helps. -- Matthew
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
