Hi Russel, No, it doesn't depend. It's always a new value.
Best regards On 29 January 2014 10:10, Russell Brown <russell.br...@me.com> wrote: > > On 29 Jan 2014, at 09:57, Edgar Veiga <edgarmve...@gmail.com> wrote: > > tl;dr > > If I guarantee that the same key is only written with a 5 second interval, > is last_write_wins=true profitable? > > > It depends. Does the value you write depend in anyway on the value you > read, or is it always that you are just getting a totally new value that > replaces what is in Riak (regardless what is in Riak)? > > > > On 27 January 2014 23:25, Edgar Veiga <edgarmve...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi there everyone! >> >> I would like to know, if my current application is a good use case to set >> last_write_wins to true. >> >> Basically I have a cluster of node.js workers reading and writing to >> riak. Each node.js worker is responsible for a set of keys, so I can >> guarantee some kind of non distributed cache... >> The real deal here is that the writing operation is not run evertime an >> object is changed but each 5 seconds in a "batch insertion/update" style. >> This brings the guarantee that the same object cannot be write to riak at >> the same time, not event at the same seconds, there's always a 5 second >> window between each insertion/update. >> >> That said, is it profitable to me if I set last_write_wins to true? I've >> been facing some massive writting delays under high loads and it would be >> nice if I have some kind of way to tune riak. >> >> Thanks a lot and keep up the good work! >> >> > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
