Thanks Brian, I suspected it was a constraint applied in the client tools (although in my case the Python ones).
On 22 November 2013 13:05, Brian Roach <ro...@basho.com> wrote: > Matt - > > This has never been a restriction in Riak itself AFAIK. I fixed the > same issue in the Java client over a year ago - it was using a hashmap > for links so duplicates were discarded; > https://github.com/basho/riak-java-client/pull/165 > > - Roach > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Matt Black <matt.bl...@jbadigital.com> > wrote: > > Apologies for the bump! > > > > Basho guys, can I get a confirmation on the uniqueness of links between > two > > objects please? (Before I go an modify the code in my app to suit) > > > > Thanks > > Matt > > > > > > > > On 19 November 2013 14:31, Matt Black <matt.bl...@jbadigital.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hello list, > >> > >> Once upon a time, a link from one object to another was unique - you > >> couldn't add two links from object A onto object B. I know this as I > had to > >> code around it in our app. > >> > >> At some stage that limitation has been removed - in either the Python > >> bindings or Riak itself. > >> > >> Can anyone else confirm this? Basho peeps, are non-unique links the > >> intended behaviour? > >> > >> Thanks > >> Matt Black > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > riak-users mailing list > > riak-users@lists.basho.com > > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
