I did a PUT, and the vclock that came back was: a85hYGBgzGDKBVIcypz/fgZJFylnMCUy5rEyNOdtOc2XBQA=
Then I read the object back, modified it, and PUT it again, providing the old vclock, and got a new vclock: a85hYGBgzGDKBVIcypz/fgZJFylnMCUy5bEyNOdtOc2XBQA= (Notice they are slightly different: Uy5rEy -> Uy5bEy) Then, I did a DELETE, using the first vector clock, not the second, updated one. After that the object was gone, I could not find it in the database any more. Is this supposed to be like that - deleting an object providing a stale vclock actually deletes it? Or am I probably doing something wrong? Thanks, Gints -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/DELETE-and-vclocks-tp4029176.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
