Hi Christian, One of the reasons we always recommend to have a minimum of 5 nodes in the cluster is that the responsibility for fall-back partitions can be distributed fairly evenly among the remaining nodes if one goes down. With only 4 nodes in the cluster it is much less likely that the responsibility for fall-back partitions will be evenly distributed, and you may experience some nodes getting much more than others.
If you were to add a node to your cluster and perform the test again you should see a much more even distribution. Best regards, Christian On 12 May 2013, at 12:48, Christian Steinmann <christian.steinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > i made a test with a 4 node cluster, where 1 node (node 4) is stopped after > half an hour. Half an hour later i restarted this node. I analyzed the logs > of all nodes after 2 hours. Node 1 and 2 had handoff data for node 4, node 3 > not. The Bench Tool was running all the time and sending inserts to node 1,2 > and 3. > > My questions are: Are only some nodes responsible for hinted handoff, when a > specific node fails? Can i find some documentation about this behavior > somewhere? > > Greetings Christian > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com