Thanks Kelly. If you need test environment or more data, please let me know.
Thank you, Stefan. On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Kelly McLaughlin <ke...@basho.com> wrote: > Stefan, > > I have been able to reproduce the problem you saw and I have opened a > github issue to address it here: > https://github.com/basho/riak_cs/issues/532. Thanks again for the report > and we should have a fix for it pushed to github very soon. > > Kelly > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Kelly McLaughlin <ke...@basho.com> wrote: > >> Stefan, >> >> Thanks for the report. We will investigate this and let you know what we >> find. >> >> Kelly >> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Silasi Stefan <silasiste...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm testing RIAK-CS as an S3 alternative and I get some strange crashing >>> when reading data from it. The following is reproducible with each run of >>> the python script. >>> >>> conn = boto.connect_s3( >>> aws_access_key_id = access_key, >>> aws_secret_access_key = secret_key, >>> host = riak_host, >>> proxy = riak_host, >>> proxy_port = 8080, >>> calling_format = boto.s3.connection.OrdinaryCallingFormat(), >>> debug = 2, >>> is_secure = False, >>> ) >>> >>> bucket = conn.create_bucket('bucket_name') >>> >>> for row in rows: >>> key=bucket.new_key(valid_key_name) >>> if key.exists(): >>> key.open_read() >>> >>> >>> If I monitor the riak-cs memory usage, it is growing and growing until >>> it's using all RAM+SWAP, then it crashes. >>> In the console log, the following line is appended before RIAK-CS >>> crashes: >>> >>> 2013-04-10 08:28:40.802 [info] <0.41.0> alarm_handler: >>> {set,{system_memory_high_watermark,[]}} >>> >>> Nothing related in the error.log. >>> In access.log I see a lot of HEAD requests for the objects stored. >>> >>> Current architecture looks like this: >>> - 3 virtual machines with 4 cores, 4gb ram, 2gb swap and 1tb disk each >>> - RIAK installed on all of them, configured as cluster >>> - stanchion installed on all of them >>> - RIAK-CS installed on all of them, configured to "speak" only with >>> local RIAK >>> - about 10GB of data storred in each RIAK with N=3. >>> >>> The strange thing is that if I move the connect-to part in the FOR loop, >>> RIAK-CS memory usage doesn't go over 300MB. Any ideas what could be wrong? >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Stefan. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
