8 is too small. Try 32 or the default, 64. 

@siculars
http://siculars.posterous.com

Sent from my iRotaryPhone

On Nov 21, 2012, at 14:10, "Cornelius Schmale" <s...@fh-wedel.de> wrote:

> Hi Bryan, 
> 
> thanks for your excellent answer, it helped a lot for a deeper knowledge of 
> riak. 
> 
> You are right, I am using the default-one-node development cluster. After 
> decreasing the ring size to 8 as mentioned by you, everything works fine.
> 
> I will post your answer unter my question at Stackoverflow, if it is ok for 
> you?
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> Cornelius
> 
> --
> Cornelius Schmale
> FH Wedel Gemeinnützige Schulgesellschaft mbH Feldstraße 143, 22880 Wedel
> Tel.: +49 4103 8048-736
> E-Mail: s...@fh-wedel.de
> Web: http://www.fh-wedel.de/
> 
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Wedel
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Pinneberg HRB 1578
> Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Eike Harms
> 
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Bryan Fink [mailto:br...@basho.com] 
> Gesendet: Montag, 19. November 2012 16:07
> An: Cornelius Schmale
> Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
> Betreff: Re: Pipe worker startup failed:fitting was gone before startup
> 
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Cornelius Schmale <s...@fh-wedel.de> wrote:
>> I have some problems using riak and mapreduce queries. I’ve described 
>> the hole problem at
>> 
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13345448/riak-fails-at-mapreduce-qu
>> eries-which-configuration-to-use
> 
> Hi, Cornelius. Could you describe a bit, your Riak configuration?
> Specifically, how many nodes are in your cluster, and what is the 
> ring_creation_size from you app.config?
> 
> If, for example, you're using a default setup {ring_creation_size, 64} on a 
> one-node development cluster, this behavior is quite likely.
> 155,000 items is enough to get all 64 vnodes working.
> 
> In the first case, before raising map_js_vm_count, those 64 vnodes are 
> fighting over just 8 Javascript VMs, and so some are likely to be starved 
> long enough to time out, which will cause the "All VMs are busy" log message.
> 
> In the second case, after raising map_js_vm_count, it's likely that those 36 
> Javascript VMs just aren't able to process all 155,000 items before the query 
> timeout arrives. The "fitting was gone before startup" log message is saying 
> that pipe running the query shut down while there were still inputs arriving 
> at vnodes.
> 
> You're not seeing either of these behaviors in the simple case with no map 
> function because no interaction with Javascript VMs is required.
> In addition, for that case, objects are not even read off of disk, further 
> alleviating resource contention.
> 
> The two configuration solutions I expect will help the most are lowering 
> ring_creation_size, and raising the query timeout. Lowering 
> ring_creation_size to 16, or even 8 on a single-node cluster will cause less 
> contention for Javascript VMs because there will be less attempted 
> parallelism in the map function processing. Raising the query timeout (should 
> be an argument to the 'run' function, or similar, but I'm not familiar with 
> the riak-js client), will give the query more time to finish before shutting 
> down, which may be necessary to overcome slow processing.
> 
> Rewriting your map function in Erlang should also help, since it will be 
> faster, and will not have the same sort of VM contention. But, I understand, 
> that's not as easy to using in early-stage development.
> 
> HTH,
> Bryan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.com
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to