RIAK does not make sense to compare with elevelDB, objective was to assess the cost of organizing the cluster. I was surprised by the difference in performance. I expected to order 20 000 put / sec. Perhaps, RIAK configured incorrect? With these results, you need at least 4 servers with RIAK to replace one server elevelDB. RIAK positioned as a high-performance cluster, I think it is contrary to the speed of one node = 6636 put/sec with a record size of 55 bytes.
I'm wrong? This is not idle curiosity, I hoped to use it in one of my projects. But the cost of the required number of servers will be too big. -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Efficiency-of-RIAK-tp4025765p4025785.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
