Hi, The node is OK and not down. I have a way to do load balancing externally to JAVA Client. I am evaluating Riak for using in my company and want to measure maximal throughput vs single node.
Thanks, Pavel On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Guido Medina <guido.med...@temetra.com>wrote: > That question has been answered few times, here is my old answer: > > Hi, > > It is the Java client which to be honest, doesn't handle well one node > going down, so, for example, in my company we use HA proxy for that, here is > a starting configuration: https://gist.github.com/1507077 > > Once we switched to HA proxy we just use a simple client without cluster > config, so the Java client doesn't know anything about the load balancing > going on. It works well, I can upgrade and restart servers without our Java > application be complaining. > > Regards, > > Guido. > > > On 10/10/12 12:58, Pavel Kogan wrote: > > Thanks, > > I will try this solution. > > Pavel > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:51 PM, kamiseq <kami...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> well I asked same question few days ago (maybe 2 weeks form now) and >> the answer was that yes sharing client is thread safe and all you >> should do is to create new bucket instance on every request >> >> pozdrawiam >> Paweł Kamiński >> >> kami...@gmail.com >> pkaminski....@gmail.com >> ______________________ >> >> >> On 10 October 2012 09:25, Pavel Kogan <pavel.ko...@cortica.com> wrote: >> > 1) Is it ok to share a single pbc client object between 50 threads? >> Should >> > it be protected by lock ? >> > 2) I didn't do load balancing between nodes yet, cause I want to >> understand >> > better throughput limit. I am planning to do it for much higher >> throughput. >> > >> > Pavel >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:21 AM, kamiseq <kami...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> maybe the good start is to share pbclient object and only create >> >> bucket per request, you will save few steps on client configuration. >> >> have you tried balancing requests to cluster and distribute them over >> all >> >> nodes? >> >> >> >> pozdrawiam >> >> Paweł Kamiński >> >> >> >> kami...@gmail.com >> >> pkaminski....@gmail.com >> >> ______________________ >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10 October 2012 06:18, Pavel Kogan <pavel.ko...@cortica.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > I have Riak cluster consisting of 5 nodes that contains about 30 >> >> > millions of >> >> > keys (35% of capacity according to Riak Control). >> >> > Currently we have single JAVA client reading and writing records to >> same >> >> > node. I need some tips, how to use the client efficiently >> >> > to reach maximal throughput - I would like to be able to read/write >> up >> >> > to >> >> > 100 records/sec on 1Gbit network. Currently I get a lot >> >> > of JAVA socket exceptions after a while (even for the much slower >> rate - >> >> > 10 >> >> > records/sec), after which I need to restart client and node. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Pavel >> >> > >> >> > P.S: My client using 50 threads and pbc client is created and >> >> > shut-downed >> >> > per request. >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > riak-users mailing list >> >> > riak-users@lists.basho.com >> >> > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing > listriak-users@lists.basho.comhttp://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
