Yes, I've been meaning to bug report this too. Please can the PyPi packages be fixed?
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Matt Black <matt.bl...@jbadigital.com>wrote: > Hey list, > > I'm upgrading to Riak 1.2 and moving over to the latest Python bindings at > the same time. What's the current recommended install process for this? I'd > (obviously) like to use pip for simplicity - but it seems that's not > currently working (details below). I recall manually installing protobuf > once upon a time, but I thought we were beyond this now? > > Thanks y'all > > From pip install riak==1.5.0: > > Downloading/unpacking riak-pb>=1.2.0,<1.3.0 (from riak) > Running setup.py egg_info for package riak-pb > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<string>", line 14, in <module> > File "/home/ubuntu/build/riak-pb/setup.py", line 4, in <module> > from proto_cmd import build_proto, clean_proto > ImportError: No module named proto_cmd > Complete output from command python setup.py egg_info: > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "<string>", line 14, in <module> > > File "/home/ubuntu/build/riak-pb/setup.py", line 4, in <module> > > from proto_cmd import build_proto, clean_proto > > ImportError: No module named proto_cmd > > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
