Anyone please?
On Jul 28, 2012 6:59 PM, "Kaspar Thommen" <kaspar.thom...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran the following Java snippet that creates a bucket, stores a key/value
> pair in it, deletes the key, and adds a new value for that same key. The
> n-value is 3 and all r- and w-values are also set to 3 to ensure full
> consistency (for testing only). Here's the code:
>
> public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
> IRiakClient riak = RiakFactory.pbcClient();
> try {
> // store an object in a new bucket
> Bucket testBucket =
> riak.createBucket("testBucket").nVal(3).allowSiblings(true).execute();
> testBucket.store("key", "value1").w(3).execute();
>
> System.out.println(testBucket.fetch("key").r(3).execute().getValueAsString());
> // prints 'value1'
>
> // now delete it and store another object with the same key
> testBucket.delete("key").r(3).w(3).execute();
> testBucket.store("key", "value2").w(3).execute();
>
> System.out.println(testBucket.fetch("key").r(3).execute().getValueAsString());
> // throws 'UnresolvedConflictException: Siblings found'
>
> } finally {
> riak.shutdown();
> }
> }
>
> As you can see by the comment I have added to the code fetching the key a
> second time should, in my opinion, return the new value, but it fails
> because there are siblings. Maybe I didn't fully understand how sibling
> handling works, but I don't see how there can possibly be any siblings
> given that r and w are 3. Any pointers? I tried the LevelDB and memory
> backends, same result.
>
> Thanks,
> Kaspar
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
