I've read somewhere here on the mailing list that storing blobs that are more than 50KB isn't recommended. Is that correct? If so, is it something specific to storage backend?
~Vlad On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Alvaro Videla <videlalv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Like this perhaps: https://github.com/johnthethird/riak-fuse *cough* *cough* > > > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Shuhao Wu <ad...@thekks.net> wrote: >> >> It'll be interesting if you can write a filesystem on top of Riak. >> >> That would be a cool project to see on github :P >> >> Shuhao >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Praveen Baratam >> <praveen.bara...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Everybody! >>> >>> I have read abundantly over the web that Riak is very well suited to >>> store and retrieve small binary objects such as images, docs, etc. >>> >>> In our scenario we are planning to use Riak to store uploads to our >>> portal which is a Social Network. Uploads are mostly images with maximum >>> size of 2 MB and typical size ranges between few KBs to few 100 KBs. >>> >>> Does this usage pattern fit Riak? What are the caveats if any? >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> riak-users mailing list >>> riak-users@lists.basho.com >>> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
