That would be most appreciated. I just completed a very bare minimum higher level API that's similar to the current Python client. However, there's still a lot of work to be done. Once again, I'm just one lone student working in my spare time and I can't possibly think of everything. If we want to bring Python up to speed with the rest of the clients, I'll need more people helping me!
Also, I have a general plan of bringing riakkit to riak-python-client2 as well. Shuhao On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Jim Adler <jim.ad...@comcast.net> wrote: > I'll certainly take a look at your repo and help where I can. > > Jim > > Sent from my phone. Please forgive the typos. > > On Mar 11, 2012, at 11:25 PM, Shuhao Wu <ad...@thekks.net> wrote: > > > I'm not too familiar with PBC . I'm looking for individuals to help me as > I'm just a student and only working on it in my spare time. > > Shuhao > On Mar 11, 2012 10:43 PM, "Jim Adler" <jim.ad...@comcast.net> wrote: > >> This is great Shuhao! >> >> I've had problems using the python client using multiple threads with >> protocol buffers. The exact same multithreaded code works fine with http >> protocol. So, any attention you can give to the pbc transport would be >> hugely appreciated. >> >> Good luck! Can't wait to give your new client a test drive. >> >> Jim >> >> Sent from my phone. Please forgive the typos. >> >> On Mar 11, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Shuhao Wu <ad...@thekks.net> wrote: >> >> Hey guys, >> >> I've been working with riak and python for the past couple of months, and >> I'm at the point where I'm ready to completely reimplement >> riak-python-client. So.. I did/started. The project is hosted on github and >> under the same apache 2 license as the original client. >> >> https://github.com/ultimatebuster/riak-python-client2 >> >> Couple of key highlights right now: >> >> 1. 2 layers of API, a very basic layer (Transports), which handles >> communicating with the server, and a high level API, which consists of >> Bucket, Object, and so on. >> 2. Eliminated things like `set_` and `get_`. Made them just variables >> where possible >> >> I'm still taking suggestions for how to reimplement RiakObject (now >> called RObject). Any feedback will be appreciated. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Shuhao >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >>
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
