On second thought, let's assume you have 100TBs worth of photos. (I'm sure there are a few individual photos somewhere on the internet that come it at 100TBs but I'm betting you don't have them).
Riak should work well for this. * I'm assuming you'll have a lot of keys, so the LevelDB backend is probably going to be best for local storage. We are also shipping LevelDB with Snappy compression enabled as of 1.1, so this will help with the disk storage requirements. * Try to keep your file size under 20MB if possible. * Keep in mind that 100TB with a default of 3 for a replication will yield 300TB of raw data. Feel free to fire more questions as they come to mind. Hope that helps. Mark On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Mark Phillips <m...@basho.com> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > I just want to make sure I understand your question correctly: > > Do you have 100TBs of photos you are thinking of storing in Riak? Or one > photo that's 100TB? > > Mark > > 2012/2/21 郎咸武 <langxian...@163.com> > >> >> Hi all, >> How many TB to be store in riak? >> Now i have about100TB picture. I want to store with riak. But i am not >> sure that is ok. >> Answer me, please. >> Thanks. >> jason >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> riak-users mailing list >> riak-users@lists.basho.com >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com >> >> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
