Hi,

We are working on the distributed version of Zotonic (the Erlang CMS), as some 
know.

We have some home-grown Dynamo like software for the ring-management.
Still I want to do a reality check, as I much prefer to go with more "standard" 
software.

For Riak we bumped into the following problems with some Zotonic use-cases:

1. It must be safe out of the box.  This means:
    - Only ports open that are controlled by the Zotonic access control.
    - So no Riak APIs (webmachine, protocol buffers, handoff listeners etc.)
    Are there configurations for Riak to disable those ports?

2. A very common install is a single machine/node, growing when needed.
    We don't want to store three copies of all data on a single machine when 
that is so common.
    Is it possible to tune the riak put/get FSMs to group requests to vnodes on 
the same node?
    Do the vnodes 
    In that case we might be able to use a special storage engine per node.

3. We have many sites with many tables in a single install.
    Think of 20+ sites with 30+ tables.
    It must be possible to:
    - keeps these tables/data separated
    - move all data for one site between servers
   How can this be done without having a too big gossip state and how can we 
keep the data partitioned?

4. We need ad-hoc queries. 
    I have the impression that the full text and 2i indexing of Riak is 
problematic for us because:
    - we have document based queries (Riak full text is term based)
    - many documents have the same terms (think categories etc)
    - 
   As a solution I think of implementing a SQL backend (PostgreSQL and Sqlite3) 
with its own commands.
   We are doing that already in our own Dynamo trials.
   What problems should I expect when following that route?

5. We have services per site, not only per node.
     - Is it possible to use more complex service names than just an atom?

6. We are using a Webmachine clone, which is much faster for our use case.
    I understand to use our version I need to clone the whole Riak repo and 
modify rebar.config files, is that correct?


Guess I will have more questions when we do decide to take the Riak route.


Marc Worrell




_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to