On Oct 18, 2011 11:12 AM, "Greg Stein" <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >... > The short answer: my branch puts connection management into the > transport, and Brett's patches puts that into the client. A decision > needs to be made, and that will determine future work. I've previously > emailed with an explanation for why I believe the transport class > should handle this (via a connection manager), and why (IMO) the > client should not be worrying about it. Making this decision removes > blocks for future changes (eg. timeouts).
Thoughts, Russell? Cheers, -g
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
