We'll be testing that, among other options. I'll try to publish our findings 
when done. Thanks.

-Nate

On Oct 11, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Jeremiah Peschka wrote:

> Have you done any tuning of your put options? I've seen significant 
> improvement by turning off ReturnBody and setting w to a low value.
> 
> Jeremiah Peschka
> Founder, Brent Ozar PLF
> 
> On Oct 11, 2011 8:50 AM, "Nate Lawson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not just for testing. We found that loading/updating keys was somewhat 
> slow, even with a low replication count. So we're exploring routes of taking 
> a node down in an existing cluster, loading a large batch of keys, and then 
> bringing it up. It's ok if it takes the data a while to rebalance after we 
> rejoin the node.
> 
> It sounds like this isn't as explored as I first thought, so we'll do our own 
> analysis.
> 
> -Nate
> 
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Ryan Zezeski wrote:
> 
> > Nate,
> >
> > You could do this but if you're just doing it for testing then it seems 
> > like more work than necessary.  If you insist on doing it this way you'll 
> > want to write it in Erlang so you can make use of the preflist calculation, 
> > riak_object, and eleveldb driver.
> >
> > You could do the following:
> >
> > 1. stand up a fresh cluster
> >
> > 2. use one of the clients to load the data
> >
> > 3. archive the data dir on all nodes
> >
> > Next time you want to stand up a cluster with the same data simply 
> > unarchive the data dirs before starting the cluster.
> >
> > -Ryan
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Nate Lawson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > We're working on a test where we want to add batches of keys to Riak. We're 
> > using the LevelDB backend with 1.0. One suggestion we heard was to take 
> > down a node, batch insert directly into the backing store, and then bring 
> > the node up again.
> >
> > Could someone give us some more details on this? How would Riak know which 
> > keys in LevelDB had not yet been redistributed to the rest of the cluster?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Nate
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> riak-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com


_______________________________________________
riak-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com

Reply via email to