I would think that the InnoDB backend would be a better backend for the use case you're describing. --- Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar PLF, LLC Microsoft SQL Server MVP
On Sep 14, 2011, at 8:09 AM, Jeremy Raymond wrote: > Hi, > > I store data in Riak whose keys constantly get overwritten with new data. I'm > currently using Bitcask as the back-end and recently noticed the Bitcask data > folder grow to 24GB. After restarting the nodes, which I think triggered > Bitcask merge, the data went down to 96MB. Today the data dirs are back up to > around 500MB. Would an alternate backend better suit this type of use case > where keys are constantly being overwritten? > > - Jeremy > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com _______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
