* So do you perform all writes into Riak & Redis simultaneously, or do you use some sort of hook from Riak (or Redis, if it exists)? And then all reads occur only from Redis?
<http://www.loomlearning.com/> Jonathan Langevin Systems Administrator Loom Inc. Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 * On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com>wrote: > Riak had no native ordering capabilities (save search) and has issues with > key enumeration. > > Redis has native dates types that support explicit and implicit ordering as > well as set membership, among many other things. > > In that light, Redis is virtually a perfect complement to Riak. > Unfortunately, Redis clustering/sharding is an exercise for the reader. > > -Alexander > > Sent from my rotary phone. > On Aug 9, 2011 12:42 PM, "Jonathan Langevin" <jlange...@loomlearning.com> > wrote: > > Thanks guys, can you provide more info? > > > > In what capacity do you use Redis, and what is your data flow process > > between your app and Redis, Riak? > > Is it distributed as well? If so, do you make use of that distributed > > functionality, or do you use a single-server instance of Redis? > > * > > > > <http://www.loomlearning.com/> > > Jonathan Langevin > > Systems Administrator > > Loom Inc. > > Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - > > www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 > > * > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Alexander Sicular <sicul...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > >> I second pairing Riak and Redis. > >> > >> -Alexander > >> > >> Sent from my rotary phone. > >> On Aug 9, 2011 12:23 PM, "Chad DePue" <c...@inakanetworks.com> wrote: > >> > We always use Redis w/ Riak and have had great results. > >> > > >> > Chad DePue > >> > inakanetworks.com - development consulting | skype cdepue | > @chaddepue > >> > +1 206.866.5707 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Langevin < > >> > jlange...@loomlearning.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> I'm already a huge fan of Riak after the short time that I've worked > >> with > >> >> it, but a common concern I've seen is regarding performance. > >> >> To continue to take advantage of it's data persistence features, > >> powerful > >> >> m/r functionality, etc, but to gain performance, I'm thinking of > pairing > >> my > >> >> application with another (throwaway) nosql solution that would exist > to > >> >> provide greater read performance. > >> >> > >> >> This inspiration comes from seeing others using MongoDB + MySQL, for > >> >> instance. I'm thinking using something such as Memcache, or Membase< > >> http://www.couchbase.org/get/couchbase> (though > >> > >> >> I haven't checked into setup requirements), may be a good option, as > I'm > >> >> already accustomed to caching with Memcache from PHP, but I've not > had > >> any > >> >> large-scale experience with Memcache yet. > >> >> Ideally anything that is lightweight, easy to roll out, and extremely > >> fast. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Before I venture down this road, are there any comments on this > >> approach? > >> >> Any suggestions or recommendations? > >> >> Or are there speedy solutions available for Riak already? > >> >> > >> >> <http://www.loomlearning.com/> > >> >> * Jonathan Langevin > >> > >> >> Systems Administrator > >> >> Loom Inc. > >> >> Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - > >> >> www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 * > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> riak-users mailing list > >> >> riak-users@lists.basho.com > >> >> http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >> >> > >> >> > >> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
