We always use Redis w/ Riak and have had great results. Chad DePue inakanetworks.com - development consulting | skype cdepue | @chaddepue +1 206.866.5707
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Langevin < jlange...@loomlearning.com> wrote: > I'm already a huge fan of Riak after the short time that I've worked with > it, but a common concern I've seen is regarding performance. > To continue to take advantage of it's data persistence features, powerful > m/r functionality, etc, but to gain performance, I'm thinking of pairing my > application with another (throwaway) nosql solution that would exist to > provide greater read performance. > > This inspiration comes from seeing others using MongoDB + MySQL, for > instance. I'm thinking using something such as Memcache, or > Membase<http://www.couchbase.org/get/couchbase> (though > I haven't checked into setup requirements), may be a good option, as I'm > already accustomed to caching with Memcache from PHP, but I've not had any > large-scale experience with Memcache yet. > Ideally anything that is lightweight, easy to roll out, and extremely fast. > > > Before I venture down this road, are there any comments on this approach? > Any suggestions or recommendations? > Or are there speedy solutions available for Riak already? > > <http://www.loomlearning.com/> > * Jonathan Langevin > Systems Administrator > Loom Inc. > Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - > www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 * > > > _______________________________________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com > >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com