Ahh, that's a good question, anyone have any feedback on using this method for adding new nodes to a cluster, as opposed to letting Riak sync up a newly added node?*
<http://www.loomlearning.com/> Jonathan Langevin Systems Administrator Loom Inc. Wilmington, NC: (910) 241-0433 - jlange...@loomlearning.com - www.loomlearning.com - Skype: intel352 * On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/1/2011 3:05 AM, Fyodor Yarochkin wrote: > >> I'm setting up a brand-new staging server, with Riak 0.14.2. >>> >>> As I want to get all production data, I thought I could scp the data >>> directory into the new one (besides the ring dir). >>> >>> >> What I normally do in this case is 'riak-admin backup .. and >> riak-admin restore from that file. works like a charm. and you can >> selectively backup/restore a node, or a the whole cluster. >> > > Assuming the nodes are well-connected, does this work better than adding a > new node, letting data migrate there, then removing the old one? > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com > > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > riak-users mailing list > riak-users@lists.basho.com > http://lists.basho.com/**mailman/listinfo/riak-users_**lists.basho.com<http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com> >
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
